As most businesses knows, answering a Request for Proposal (RFP) is a thankless, painstaking, and time-
While we would never turn down a great opportunity because it is an RFP, over the years we have become much more rigorous about the types of RFPs we respond to. Recently, we decided to pursue an RFP from “Company X” because it fit the basic criteria we established for pursuit:
After investing close to 60 hours of team time thinking about, brainstorming, and designing a great solution, we shipped off the RFP and waited for a response.
About two weeks after they told us they would get back to us, we heard that while the solution we proposed sounded great, there was a much smaller budget allocated for the customization and development of the simulation. Even though we asked if there was a budget for the customization (they wouldn’t provide a number), it turns out their expectation and our expectation was significantly different. We further found out that in the end, they went with a solution that did not include a simulation (it was a paper-based case study). Clearly, what they wanted and what they asked for in the RFP was not affordable and couldn’t be created by any reliable simulation developer.
This situation got me thinking about one of the most difficult parts of business acumen, quantifying the value proposition. Are digital, interactive, immersive simulations better than a case study? Absolutely! Are they better at 10 times the investment? It depends on the project, and it depends on the impact. In some cases, I believe the Return on Investment (ROI) could be 100 times the expense.
The Business Value of Simulations
There are three reasons why business simulations provide so much value and return on investment:
Case Study
We recently worked with a client to design, develop, and deliver a business leadership simulation to provide learning opportunities to implement a new approach to coaching. As part of the project, participants were asked a series of questions about their confidence before the simulation and their confidence after the simulation. We also conducted a learning experience with participants who just went through the learning content but didn’t have a chance to practice their new skills in the simulation.
In an organization of more than 50,000 managers, what is the impact of 68% of them improving their coaching? It is quite reasonable to calculate a 1% increase in revenues and a 1% increase in operational efficiencies. That’s a 2% drop to the bottom line. For a $30 billion company that has a ROS of 17% ($5.1 billion), a 2% increase is over $100,000,000 at least a 100 X return on the investment.